Do Smarter People Have Fewer Friends?

If you believe the class genius is a loner because he’s an arrogant know-it-all, or because he’s socially awkward, that’s not (necessarily) the case.

Do Smarter People Have Fewer Friends?

If you believe the class genius is a loner since he’s an arrogant know-it-all, or since he’s socially awkward, that’s not (always) the instance. Instead, it may be because they are honestly better without the unending inane prattling of mere mortals like you, or I.

New research study published by the British Journal of Psychology in February, authored by evolutionary psychologists Norman Li from the Singapore Administration College and also Satoshi Kanazawa from the London School of Economics, suggests that smarter people could be better going it alone.

According to them our origins in old hunter-gatherer society, in exactly what they call “the savanna theory of happiness,” describes our present understanding of joy. They use the concept to describe the outcome of a survey of 15,000 grownups between the ages of 18 as well as 28.

Assessing the stats and demographics of the survey, they discovered that (unsurprisingly) individuals that stayed in areas with more individuals per unit area were much less happy. On the other hand, individuals with even more social communications (again no surprises here) stayed that they were happier.

Here’s the shocker though: smarter individuals were not as strongly impacted by the above two variables. They could also be happier living in denser areas with less communication with others.

“The effect of population density on life satisfaction was therefore more than twice as large for low-IQ individuals than for high-IQ individuals. More intelligent individuals were actually less satisfied with life if they socialized with their friends more frequently.”

Yes, you heard that right.

“Residents of rural areas and small towns are happier than those in suburbs, who in turn are happier than those in small central cities, who in turn are happier than those in large central cities,” they explain the obvious part 1 of their findings. “Our ancestors lived as hunter–gatherers in small bands of about 150 individuals. In such settings, having frequent contact with lifelong friends and allies was likely necessary for survival and reproduction for both sexes.”

We are instinctively wired to function with each other and also to prosper in relatively little areas. Times have transformed dramatically considering that after that … and also according to the scientists, smarter people could have simply end up being much more adept at dealing with the new regular.

“More intelligent individuals, who possess higher levels of general intelligence and thus greater ability to solve evolutionarily novel problems, may face less difficulty in comprehending and dealing with evolutionarily novel entities and situations.”

Bear in mind, this conclusion was gotten to by personnel that are probably above-average in regards to knowledge to begin with. It is likewise just a theory, made up to discuss their searching for, and also not a reason to avoid that man that keeps going down random factoids (he’s probably not truly that intense anyhow). There’s one more concept: perhaps some individuals just can’t stand discussions that consistently revolve around star praise?


More in G+ Healthy Tips, Mental Health, MP Health Tips, Other
Does Eating a High-Carbohydrate Load Have Impact On the Heart?

A group of scientists from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Vanderbilt University used 33 participants...